1. Introduction
While both biochar and activated carbon (AC) are porous carbon materials used in filtration, their origins, production methods, and environmental lifecycles are profoundly different. This deep dive provides the technical foundation to complement the broader comparison article, grounding the discussion in engineering, chemistry, and sustainability science.
Note: ‘Biochar’ and ‘AC’ describe categories of materials. There are hundreds of types of AC and hundreds of types of biochar. It is paramount that you compare individual product specifications with application use case requirements. Do not rely on the broad category descriptors.
2. Feedstock and Origin
Activated Carbons
- Feedstock: Primarily fossil-based (coal, petroleum coke, natural gas, or LPG-derived carbon blacks). Some coconut shell or lignite grades exist but remain a minority of total production.
- Activation process: Carbonisation followed by steam or chemical activation at 800–1,000 °C. Typical agents: H₃PO₄, KOH, ZnCl₂.
- Energy input: 20–30 GJ/t, nearly all fossil-fuel derived.
- Result: High purity, very high micro-porosity (BET 800–1,500 m²/g).
Biochars
- Feedstock: Renewable, traceable biomass such as clean wood chips and defined agricultural residues (excluding mixed or contaminated wastes).
- Process: Controlled pyrolysis (400–650 °C) with strict emissions control; energy is recovered via syngas combustion.
- Energy input: 8–12 GJ/t (net positive if co-generation is included).
- Result: Mixed micro–meso–macro pore structure, typical BET 150–400 m²/g.
- Carbon accounting: Each tonne typically locks away on the order of 2.5–3.0 t CO₂e, depending on feedstock, process efficiency, and certification methodology.
3. Physical Structure and Adsorption Characteristics
| Property | Activated Carbons | Biochars |
|---|---|---|
| Surface area (BET) | 800–1,500 m²/g | 150–400 m²/g |
| Dominant pores | Micropores (<2 nm) | Meso/macropores (2–100 nm) |
| Particle density | 0.45–0.55 t/m³ | 0.25–0.35 t/m³ |
| pH | Neutral to acidic | Typically alkaline (due to ash minerals) |
| Ash content | <1% | 5–15% (retained minerals) |
| Moisture for handling | <5% | 20–35% (EBC/ADR compliance) |
Implications:
- AC’s fine micropores excel for gases and very small molecules (e.g. iodine, chlorine, VOCs) but clog rapidly in nutrient-rich or turbid water.
- Biochar’s meso/macropore structure supports hydraulic flow, provides habitat for microbial attachment, and enables adsorption of medium-sized organic compounds typical of surface and process waters.
4. Filter Media Forms and Pressure Drop
Powdered Activated Carbon (PAC): <0.15 mm, high surface area but unusable in fixed beds due to extreme pressure loss and dust-explosion hazard. Used in batch dosing only.
Granular Activated Carbon (GAC): 0.5–2 mm, standard for water filters. Balanced surface area and permeability, but biofouling is common. Typical pressure drop: 5–20 kPa/m at design flow.
Extruded or Pelleted Activated Carbon (EAC): Cylindrical pellets (3–5 mm). Developed for H&S reasons (dust-free) and reduced pressure drop. Used in gas-phase and some high-flow liquid filters.
Biochar (filter-grade): Screened 1–6 mm, moist to 25–30% for dust control. Exhibits very low pressure drop, good turbulence, and natural microbial colonisation under operational conditions. Equivalent or better flow performance than GAC at comparable depths.
5. Performance by Application
| Application | Dominant Pollutants | Activated Carbons | Biochars |
| Air/gas | VOCs, odours | Excellent (EAC) | Limited (requires humidity) |
| Drinking water | Chlorine, micro-organics | Excellent | Not economical (needs 5x volume) |
| Industrial wastewater | Phenols, dyes | Effective but fouls quickly | 50–70% efficiency at 20–30% of cost |
| Farm run-off / pond water | Nutrients, humics | Rapid fouling | Strong performance; field observations indicate biofilm development may extend functional lifespan relative to sterile media, with outcomes dependent on site conditions. |
| Compost leachate / digestate | COD 100–500 mg/L | Ineffective | Robust; biologically buffered under high organic loading (no autonomous or self-directed regeneration implied). |
6. Economic Comparison (2025 realistic values)
| Factor | Activated Carbons | Biochars |
| Delivered price (UK) | £800–£1,500/t dry (<5% moisture) | £300–£500/t (20–35% moisture; £430–£700 dry-equivalent) |
| Installed bulk cost | £400–£800/m³ | £100–£250/m³ |
| Volume required (same adsorption) | 1x | 3–5x |
| Functional lifespan (dirty water) | Weeks–months | Months–years |
| End-of-life | Hazardous waste | Conditional soil reuse (subject to testing and PAS100 / EA compliance pathway) |
| Net carbon balance | +2 t CO₂e/t | −2.5 t CO₂e/t |
Cost per m³ water treated (indicative):
- Act-C: £1–£3 (industrial)
- Biochar: £0.1–0.8 (agri / environmental)
7. Health, Safety, and Handling
- ACs: Dust explosion and respiratory risk; requires dry storage and PPE. Pelleting largely introduced for H&S rather than technical necessity.
- Biochars: Shipped moist under EBC/ADR guidelines to prevent dust and self-heating. Safe to handle and biologically compatible.
8. Regulatory and Lifecycle Context
- ACs: Typically classed as hazardous waste post-use. Regeneration possible but energy intensive. Linear economy.
- Biochars: Classified as a secondary product if contaminant levels are below EA thresholds; can re-enter soil safely. Circular economy.
Lifecycle model (illustrative, not prescriptive):
Water filtration → biofilm development (observed in practice) → nutrient stabilisation (context-dependent, not guaranteed) → compost integration → soil amendment
Each phase adds value, not waste.
9. Carbon and Energy Balance
| Metric | Activated Carbon’s | Biochars |
| Embodied energy | 25–30 GJ/t | 8–12 GJ/t |
| Process fuel | Fossil | Renewable (syngas) |
| Net CO₂e balance | +2 t/t | −2.5–3 t/t |
The environmental crossover point occurs after one or two reuse cycles: a biochar filter outperforms ACs on both cost and carbon intensity.
10. Summary and Implications
- ACs excel in high-purity, low-contaminant applications (gas phase, potable water).
- Biochar** excels in nutrient- and organic-rich aqueous environments where meso/macro-porosity and biologically compatible surfaces support sustained function in practice. (**Not all biochars are soil-fit – refer to healthysoil.uk)
- Economically: Biochar offers equal or better lifecycle cost per treated cubic metre once reuse and carbon value are counted.
- Regulatorially: Biochar aligns with EA/PAS100 reuse frameworks, turning a compliance cost into a soil-health asset.
Key Takeaway
Activated carbon represents a linear, fossil-intensive model of filtration; biochar represents a circular, biologically compatible, carbon-negative model (under certified production pathways). For most real-world water systems, biochar delivers the same outcome at a fraction of the cost and with regenerative benefits.
Leave a Reply